Naylor spkrs

Speakers

From stratbo--(at)--nramp.net Mon Sep 23 22:23:49 CDT 1996
From: Nick Schepis
Newsgroups: alt.guitar.amps
Subject: Re: Jensen/Naylor questions
Date: 24 Sep 1996 02:05:43 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

dweis--(at)--ngel.net (Daniel A. Weiss) wrote:
>Greetings,
>
>I understand that the new Naylor 12" is modeled after the Jensen C12N.
>How does it compare. Also, I believe that the Naylor is a 50 watt
>speaker. Was the Jensen rated that high?
> Oh, and one more question please. Are there noticable sonic differences
>between a 63,64,or 66 C12N? Thanks.

The original Naylor special design was sonically designed to be similar
in response to the P12N. The sound is similar at lower volumes, but much
stronger when pushed. The P12N was rated at 18 watts, and the C12N at
20. Of all the speakers I've tried, this one is the best as far as the
smooth mids and glasssy highs. The magnets, voice coils and cones are
all of different construction, so there is an audible difference, but the
response is very similar.

There should be no inherent differences in a 66 vs a 64 or 65.

NS

Index:

Alnico 10s	Celestion G12K85	Celestion Quality	Cone Glue
D130F History	Dating Speakers	Early JBL history	Eminence Alnicos
Eminence Reissues	JBL D130F info	JBL dating	Jensen 1957 Prices
Jensen C vs P	Leslie Cable	Naylor spkrs	Reactive Speaker Load
Reconing JBLs	Speaker Development	Speaker sensitivity	Speakers make difference
Testing Blown Speakers	THD 2x12 cabinet	Weber C10Q	Weber C12CA Review
Weber Texas 10s	WeberVST P8Q	What Is P12NF