Jensen C vs P

Speakers

From stratbo--(at)--nramp.net Sun Dec 1 12:05:08 CST 1996
From: Nick Schepis
Newsgroups: alt.guitar.amps
Subject: Re: Jensen for Deluxe Rev.
Date: 1 Dec 1996 15:29:39 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Lebow wrote:

>Similar question. I have a '68 C12N in my '62 Deluxe. Sounds terrific
>when overdriven - very very smooth. For cleaner playing however, tone is
>much more colored and nasal compared to my '59 P12Q which has an open,
>almost hi-fi sound to it. BTW, what do you mean when you say the C12Q
>"doesn't sound all that good" ? I can play my '59 Tremolux through the
>C12Q and it starts to sound much closer to the Deluxe and visa versa.
>Just goes to show the impact of the speaker on tone.

All the ceramic Jensens (Cxxx) are a little more mid-heavy and offer
slightly less highs than their alnico (Pxxx) counterparts. The effect
increases as the power handling/efficiency goes up (as the letters
get 'smaller'). Cranking the amp into distortiom will clip the highs,
making the difference less noticeable. As for the Oxford ceramics, they
simply don't sound as good as the similar Jensens (which is why the
Jensen equipped amps are a bit more desireable).

NS

Index:

Alnico 10s	Celestion G12K85	Celestion Quality	Cone Glue
D130F History	Dating Speakers	Early JBL history	Eminence Alnicos
Eminence Reissues	JBL D130F info	JBL dating	Jensen 1957 Prices
Jensen C vs P	Leslie Cable	Naylor spkrs	Reactive Speaker Load
Reconing JBLs	Speaker Development	Speaker sensitivity	Speakers make difference
Testing Blown Speakers	THD 2x12 cabinet	Weber C10Q	Weber C12CA Review
Weber Texas 10s	WeberVST P8Q	What Is P12NF