Mic Kaczmarczik's
Why Change SF Lead Dress Information
Why Change SF Lead Dress
Questions and Answers
Why Change SF Lead Dress
This directory contains USENET articles Mic
has saved about guitars, equipment, pickup, techniques, players,
and so on. Mic has graciously granted permission to post the
stuff on the JT30 page on the off chance that it might be useful
in the context of Blues Harmonica. Mic is not responsible for
the content, just the collection.
Questions and Answers
Why Change SF Lead Dress
Why Change SF Lead Dress
From mbaier1--(at)--ail.idt.net Tue Jan 28 09:28:20 CST 1997 From: mbaier1--(at)--ail.idt.net (Karl LaFong) Newsgroups: alt.guitar.amps Subject: Re: Blackface question? Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 09:16:50 GMT
trekman wrote:
> >> >> >>> Note that some retro/blackface aficianados >> actually betray themselves when they suggest certain snips and discards >> for better tone. >> > >What exactly is the difference electronically between the b/f and w/f >amps besides the safer wiring insulation in the w/f's? Please let me >know. >Trekman
Be careful calling that plastic Gavitt wire safer..I've seen some very early SF's with the new wire type that had the old style lead dress. Problem is, the plastic "safer" wires' insulation had melted due to the heat and pressure of the eyelet boad (we're talking about the wire under the board) and had shorted underneath the board. Sounds like a great way to get electrocuted. I'm certain that this is what precipitated the funky lead dress in SF amps. I've got a number of '50's and '60's Fenders with the terrible cloth wire that work just fine, thank you. LaFong