Mic Kaczmarczik's
Deluxe reissue vs original Information
Deluxe reissue vs original
Fender
Deluxe reissue vs original
This directory contains USENET articles Mic
has saved about guitars, equipment, pickup, techniques, players,
and so on. Mic has graciously granted permission to post the
stuff on the JT30 page on the off chance that it might be useful
in the context of Blues Harmonica. Mic is not responsible for
the content, just the collection.
Fender
Deluxe reissue vs original
From Teleologis--(at)--orry.noEmail Wed May 1 13:39:49 CDT 1996
Article: 14103 of alt.guitar.amps
From: Teleologist Newsgroups: alt.guitar.amps,rec.audio.tubes
Subject: Re: resistors - carbon vs. metal
Date: Wed, 01 May 1996 09:49:24 -0500
Organization: MCSNet Internet Services
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <318779F4.169--(at)--orry.noEmail>
References: <3183E22F.2A6--(at)--n.com> <3185FF4C.540--(at)--orry.noEmail> NNTP-Posting-Host: alsnt.image.ctt.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (WinNT; I)
Xref: geraldo.cc.utexas.edu alt.guitar.amps:14103 rec.audio.tubes:9176
Robert Fries wrote:
>
> James Lane wrote:
>
> >mr teleologist,
>
> >what speaker, tube, bias combination would you recommend for the deluxe
> >reissue? They come stock with jensen 12" and fender tubes.
>
> >Thanks in advance for the info.
>
> >-James
> Didn't see the original post from Jim - Bob is correct about the Eminence
speaker, tubes etc. The Eminence 12" speaker is a little weird as it has
the deep cone angle & small dust cover like the old P12 alnico Jensens, but
with a BIG ceramic magnet. IMO it sounds decent in the pseudo tweeds, but
lacks bass response & punch while 'razor-blading' your ears in the BF
circuits. The C12 series Jensens have a shallower cone angle & a bigger
dust cap which produce more bottom and a less tightly focused top end.
Although not commonly shipped in the Deluxe Reverb I like(and have) an
original cone C12Q. This version has a larger magnet, a 1/4" bigger voice
coil, and IMO handles modern 'cranked up' power levels better than the
usual C12R. Tremolux has posted that some guys are using P12Ns or Ps in
Deluxe Reverbs & loving the results - Haven't tried that....yet!
The amps I AB'd were my own '66(bought new in '66!) & a 1st year
reissue(93?) using the C12Q in my amp & also a JBL D120F in a repro Deluxe
extension cab. As I recall tubes at the time were an Amperex or Mullard
GZ34/5AR4, Sylvania 6V6GTAs, & Phillips/Sylvania 12AT7s & 12AX7s. The same
set of tubes were swapped in the same positions from amp to amp. My amp's
'sweet spot' happens with the tubes biased between 24 & 25ma per tube with
about 417-418 B+(about 413 on the plates). All voltages were consistent
bewteen the 2 amps. Each amp was recorded to digital 3 ways(direct plus 2
mikes) with clean & distorted sounds from different guitars & 2 different
players(no EQ tweeking on the board BUT settings on the amps were different
- pot tapers are different so this isn't a pure scientific test...we were
curious!). The tapes were AB'd thru headphones, nearfield monitors, &
upgraded JBL 4311Bs and it was difficult(but possible) to tell them apart!
The oldie had a little more compression & a slightly mellower top end. With
a RIC-12 clean using the D120F, higher frequency harmonics seemed to bloom
better on the oldie but were definately present with the reissue. (BTW -
Both amps sounded like ____ using the reissue speaker!)
A friend has a reissue Twin Reverb which received a pair of JBL E120s &
Sylvania STR 415s. For the very few live gigs I play I usually rent a
favorite BF Twin Reverb & these 2 amps compare fairly well despite differnt
speakers etc.