Those things the brain uses to process sound that Jim mentioned?, they're pitch, intensity,timbre,tonal memory, and rhythm. An intersting read for anyone trying to design an experiment concerning sound and humans is found at http://hobbs.leesummit.k12.mo.us/projects/lsn/compsci/therapy_music/research.htm
Long address and no doubt I hosed it.
Lets say you were designing an experiment to see if the notes on a pianop were different. You play a note then another and see if people hear a difference. Many would. Now if you ask them to name the 1st note then the second note the failure rate would go way up. Play 7ths and it goes up even more. Octaves are also confusing. A certain group of people would hear no difference at all or not be able to know which note was different right after they were played. Use a very small sample and you could get all people that can discern the 7ths and the octaves or all people that don't hear a difference. Does this experiment tell me whether the notes on as piano are different? No. Does it tell me something about the way humans hear? Perhaps. Change the instrument to harmonica and it gets even more murky. Why, because the a/b test doesn't tell you whether the player can tell the difference between wood and plastic and it doesn't tell you whether a long term impression about wood and plastic sounds can be formed. If you knew me to talk to and you called my house and my brother answered you'd think it was me. If you were my mother and you expected me you might be tricked but the likely hood drops and you wouldn't be fooled for long. The human processing of sounds and memory is a very complex interaction. If I were looking to design an experiment concerning sound I'd probably do some research 1st and see what others have done and if and why they felt it worked. fjm