>So we could change the discussion to the question how Wim gets his >augmented triad chrom" and in a years time we well see...
>There are two ways to try it out: >1. Hardware method": Get the augmented triad chrom" by retuning an >existing chrom. Winslow already did it. Maybe someone give some hints. >2. Software method": Get a midi harmonica with a programmable interface. >The advantage of this method would be the possibility to try out some other >tunings. If there is only Wim trying out it may take some more years...... >We have been discussing this already, maybe there are some results off >list?
Didi, thanks for your interest.
About Hardware method": Get the augmented triad chrom" by retuning an >existing chrom. Siegfried Naruhn built such an instrument for me. He did do a great job and for me it was possible to discover a lot of thinks about the augmented triad system. But, a lot of problems arise: - - retuning a chr. harmonica takes a lot of time - - a retuned harmonica does not last as long (or short) as a harmonica in original tuning. One needs a couple of harmonicas to be able to study it for a year - - the retuned (augmented triad) harmonica does not sound as well and it does not play as well as an original model, so it can only be used in study situations - - to be able to make a PERFECT retuned chr. harm., one needs completely different reedplates with the desired new positioning of the reed slots and its reeds. Practicaly, these reedplates can only be made by a harmonica manufacturer.
These are only the major problems. A lot of these problems can be solved by developing a MIDI harmonica as I mentioned in previous writings.
The only way to convince a harmonica manufacturer and harmonica players of the advantages (and disadvantages) of a different tuning system is: - - completely mastering the tuning system - - be an excellent harmonica player on both systems - - have a retuned instrument that sounds as good as possible and is as flexible as the original harmonica so the instrument is no obstacle - - be completely aware of all the advantages and disadvantages of both systems (not only theoraticaly but also practicaly!) - - maybe some more (like 'marketing problems' or 'being as famous as Toots Thielemans')
For me as a harmonica player, some problems arise: - - During the six years I studied the harmonica intensively, my brains created some kind of graphical representation of the note material I use during the act of improvising. When I play the augmented triad system, this graphical representation is no longer valid. Thats why I think, getting used to a new tuning system will take a couple of years. - - Getting used to the new tone positioning is not such a big problem. By only playing written music (without improvising), I get used to it very quickly. - - On stage, I still play the normal tuning system. All the time I need to get used to the new tuning system, I also COULD use to develop myself more and more on the old tuning system.
But, I am convinced of the fact that the augmented triad system OR the diminished seventh chord system will be very helpful in developing a contemporary jazz and classical way of playing which will be DIFFERENT from the harmonica sound of today. That's why I will spend a large amount of time in developing a MIDI harmonica and doing research in (useful) alternative tuning systems.
I hope everybody who did try out alternative tuning systems for chromatic harmonicas, will write me about their experiences. It would be very helpful to me.