From: Public Defender Date: Fri, 12 Jul 1996 12:13:40 -0700 Subject: Them Blues
It has always seemed to me that a blues song is a work of art written to be performed in the venacular. Just as many plays or other works of performance art. Just as there are no sixteenth century english actors currently performing in theatres near you there are few black blues artists born in the Mississippi delta before 1930 performing in your local club. Yet both the plays and the music are performed. They are interpreted by the artists bringing their own talent and style to the task. If it is otherwise then the music will not and should not endure. It becomes important only as a culturally interesting artifact.
An example from a perhaps overplayed but none-the-less fine old fave of this listener:
One and one is two - two and two is four Listen here baby - don't you want to go ...
The word four does not rhyme with the word go except in the venacular. How will the white female urban player who chooses to perform this song sing that verse? It's up to the performer -but it seems to me legitimate to choose to say "foe" instead of "four" and leave it to the listener to criticize. One could choose to "adapt" the work - such as: Three and four is seven - seven is a prime If you choose not to come along dear That will be fine. A modern adaptation attuned to modern thinking. Me, I'll take mine somewhere closer to the original. I mean when Roy Rodgers (chops not chaps),one of the skinniest performers I've seen, sings "Built for Comfort" on his new album (featuring Charlie Musselwhite on harp) its tasty even if he's not built for comfort.