From: Michael Will Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 16:25:16 -0700 Subject: Re: Amplified
Mike Curtis wrote: >
Don't disagree with loss associated with recording and playback. Re phychoacoustics, I've read that looking at the source of a sound increases the perceived volume by about 10%.
> Oh, at first it might make you think "distorted guitar", > but after a couple of those flat, even-sounding, "all alike" notes, you KNOW > it's a synthesizer. And this is a sample of an electric instrument! > > -- IronMan Mike Curtis
I agree that sampled sound isn't like the real thing. But, "flat, even-sounding, 'all alike' notes?" Even my cheap synth doesn't do that. It responds to velocity (how fast I push the key down) and pressure (how hard I push the key against its bed), and the timbre of the sound (not just the volume) changes with time. The way I *play* it determines how flat or even sounding or alike the notes sound. Could I fool you into thinking it was a real guitar?
For how long? Solo or as part of a "wall of sound?" Are you a guitar player (rhetorical) or a musician (ditto) or just an average listener?
The trick is to play the keyboard in the manner of a guitarist. The chord inversions, licks of choice, etc.
And don' ferget, y'all--it's only gunna git better..
- -- ..Mic'l
FAQ: http://www.island.net/~blues/faq/faq.htm Archives: http://www.garply.com/harp-l/archives Price Comparisons: http://wj.net/mic-l/Harpcosts.htm Harp Theory Charts: http://wj.net/mic-l/Harpscript.htm