>>Nah. We're just all too busy talking about ferrets and trying to pick >>fights with Doug to talk about harmonicas.
>> -- hugh
Note please our net Guru, keeper of standards, layerdown of rules, arbiter of quarrels, impartial remover of clients when harp content nonexistant. I would say that he is guilty of minimalist content. The mention of the word harmonica juxtaposed to the name of a famous and dearly loved player thereby trying to enhance his own reputation by association is hardly what I would call Harp content. ############################# In the Blue corner: .......... I'm ready. ############################# statements of belief.:
The harmonica has not been successfully synthesized yet. (Which the heck noise do you synthesize?)
The sampled sounds of harmonica are still not convincing when used to produce tunes from single sampling. (sample a tune and it sounds like a tune, play it again and it sounds the same (sheer poetry!))
Amplified harp, where the object is to present the actual sound of the harp and not a 'version' of it is pretty good, but still altered because the viewpoint of the listener is not usually that of the microphone.
Harp and amp used as a creative combined instrument has tremendous potential in music and is being fully exploited by many superb players.
The unamplified harp has its place in modern music.
The amplified sound of a harp seldom reflects the true range of volume and tone that the player is producing as the involuntary movement relative to the mic produces greater variations in these factors than the same movement relative to a listener. ###########################
OK Any takers winner sends a tape of self to loser, double defeat.
Oh! BTW Ferrets are loving, cuddlesome creatures, they LOVE being kept in the places Hugh mentioned earlier. Try it sometime. Become a male soprano at absolutely no cost.