Other web Sites
Harmonica Blues  Harmonica Amps
Harmonica Links Harmonica Pages
Archives Home
Years
 · 1992
 · 1993
 · 1994
 · 1995
 · 1996
 · 1997
 · 1998
 · 1999
 · 2000
 · 2001
 · 2002
 · 2003
 
Web HarpL
Ebay Searches:
Amps:
Microphones:
Effects:
Harmonicas and Gear:
Harmonica Music and Instruction:

 

 

Harp-L Archives

[Previous Message] [Next Message]

[Start of Thread] [End of Thread]

From: Michael Will
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 1996 10:12:56 -0700
Subject: Practice; Quality Factors (Was: Re: Met my first harp-l-er in real life...)

Christian N Michalek wrote:
>
> >
> > As for my performance, well, I've had better nights. This
> > daylight savings time thingie has my clock all screwed up.
>
> Never blame things like daylight savings on your performance. If you
> sound bad it's because you don't practice enough or simply don't have t[he]
> experience to adapt to a given situation.

I don't disagree with the point. I think the statement "you don't practice
enough" is an over-simplification that would be interesting to expand. I know
the intent was not an analysis of why someone "sounds bad" (which is almost but
not quite the same as why someone doesn't sound good, or great) so I'm not
trying to argue here. But it is an important area, I think, to consider.

Consider practice. There is effective practice and ineffective practice--or
maybe it's better to say more effective and less effective practice
techniques--the point is, it's not *just* ~how much~ you practice. Someone a
few months ago, from Britain somewhere, I believe, posted some suggestions about
approaching a practice session. Like, "Have a plan"--think about what you want
to accomplish during this practice. And "Evaluate your practice" after you are
done, that kind of thing.

It also seems like directed practice, such as that required by a skilled
teacher, would tend to be much more effective than ad-hoc practice where there
is no plan or process of progression. Once again, it's not that you don't
practice enough. It could be that you practice enough but don't practice right.
Someone posted about the affect of posture on tone. You might practice forever
with bad posture, and never get there; whereas a teacher might take one look and
say "Stand up straight" (or something that would actually work!) and *bingo*,
the tone improves! Unfortunately, bad practice can instill bad habits that are
hard to break. So practice can be ineffective, actually doing more harm than
good. (I get really good at doing things wrong %^)

I agree with Christian that if you "sound bad" it is almost certainly your own
fault, with practice being the prime culprit. But I don't think it is quite the
same thing to say (which he didn't, by the way. I'm not arguing, but
expanding.) that if you don't *sound great* you don't practice enough, or even
you don't practice enough the right way.

I liken the ability to play music to the ability to perform a sport, for
example. Some people are inherently better athletes than other people--physical
size aside. Taking an extreme, if I practiced (American) football just as much
and just as effectively as (famous football player) Joe Montana, that doesn't
mean I'd be as good a quarterback. I might be good enough to play for a small
local high school...

If I practiced piano just as much and just as effectively as Horowitz, I still
would not be as good.

I suppose I'm saying that some people probably have more innate musical ability
than others. (Out on a dry pine limb, hearing the gas start to flow, watching
the matches about to strike..).

Like we've discussed before, evaluations change as your ability grows and the
context changes. As a talented beginner people may well say (and mean) "Wow,
you really sound good!". Then you get better and go to a jam and people may say
"You suck man." Or, you get very good and play a regular gig and people say
"You sound great!". So you cut a CD and people say "You aren't very good.
You're definitely no Howard Levy.."

Some factors that could contribute to innate abilities could include:
- - Concentration (where do you lose it? can you clamp down and execute for an
entire piece? a whole set? all evening? regardless of external factors?)
- - Depth of emotion (can you keep it fresh, even the 100th time? 1000th?)
- - Having something to say (which could come from life experiences not related to
music or skill on an instrument--especially considering the blues)
- - Ability to construct musical ideas (analogous to writing: you can write simple
statements, or gramatically correct complex sentences dense with ideas, full of
imagery and metaphor.)
- - Physical characteristics (big resonant air passages? long fingers? fast hands?
tricky tongue? good ear? perfect pitch?)
- - other ideas?

- --
Mic'l
http://wj.net/mic-l