From: Barry Schaede Date: Sun, 07 Jan 1996 09:06:14 -0700 (MST) Subject: Lower pitched harmonicas
Mike Curtis writes of the advantages of matched resonance while playing lower pitched harmonicas. I have to assume that anyone who maximizes the efficiency of their acoustic coupling with any harmonica will attempt to do it with all of them. Therefore the issue of the heavier reeds is still valid. The lower harmonicas do play differently than the higher pitched ones. The reeds are longer and heavier and take more energy to initiate sounding. Less to sustain though. The envelope of the note on lower harmonicas is also substantially different. The attack lags. Much like playing a bass or drums you have to play in front of the note rather than behind it to be in time. The lower the harmonica the more pronounced this is. I have a low A harmonica that I play that's so low that if you slap it against your hand it vibrates. All of the lower notes are in the bass octave and yet it can plays quite fine at speed. An interesting thing which I've mentioned before is accidently pick up a G harmonica expecting an F and try to sound a note. It won't work the first time because you've modified your technique to accommodate the F and that technique is so different than the required technique for the G the reed won't sound. I choose not to use the word resonance to describe this occurrence because I think what's going on is more myriad and complex than that one singular aspect.
One last aside on this issue. It recently occurred to me while listening to Neil Young play harmonica on a Emmylou Harris album that the reason Dylan's and others playing sounds so different than say a Walter Horton's is the total lack of this matching technique for a specific harmonica. They just blow and draw air and move the harmonica around. A good and fine thing that produces a unique sound that I can't replicate because the minute that harmonica's in my mouth I put some English on each and every note without thinking about it. fjm